3 August 2018

Salween - Black River of Tibet





“There was a morning drizzle at Victoria Station, at the end of February 1935 – porters carolled “Mindyerbackspliz” and I murmured to someone: “Yes, send letters to Calcutta, poste restante, but we shan’t get them till we return” – a copy of Lost Horizon was shoved into my hand, two years’ supply of toothpaste was left behind, and the train moved out. Red brick suburban houses slid by, a butcher’s cart on its rounds, and the clipped hedges of Kent. Good-bye till 1937.”

It’s a familiar tableau at the start of any travel book – leaving the safety and the comfort of the mundane, day-to-day world on a voyage into the unknown; far from the usual trammels and travails of civilisation, travelling into uncharted wilds. In this case the book is a lesser known one. Sadly so, as it’s an excellent read – well worthy of a reprint as one of Eland Books’ rescued travelogues. The passage above comes from the opening of Black River of Tibet, by John Hanbury-Tracy (1938). It all began in John Hanbury-Tracy’s club near Piccadilly over a glass of beer, sitting in company with his friend Ronald Kaulback, who suggested they should go on a two year expedition in search of the source of the Salween. 

Surveys and Explorations in Himalayas and Central Asia, 1934


“But the Salween river? I had never heard of it [writes Hanbury-Tracy]. And why would it take over a year to reach the source? I searched about for a map of Asia, and opened it at Burma. Yes, there it was, a large river flowing into the sea a short way east of Rangoon; the Salween. I followed it up, northwards. It crept along the edge of Burma. There were dots in places, and that meant it was unexplored. I began to like the Salween immensely.”

Ronald Kaulback (left), with Shödung Karndempa, Governor of Zayul (centre), and John Hanbury-Tracy (right)


John Hanbury-Tracy and Ronald Kaulback were both young men at the time, in their mid-twenties. Kaulback was already familiar with this region of southeast Tibet having accompanied the plant collector, Frank Kingdon Ward on his 1933 expedition. Reading the travelogues of these men today there is a real echo of the exotic and the sense of mystery which pervades James Hilton’s eponymous adventure novel, Lost Horizon – but far from the sense of “Boys Own” nostalgia such tales might evoke today this was a kind of zeitgeist which Hanbury-Tracy, Kaulback, Kingdon Ward and others were actually living at this time. They very much saw themselves as intrepid explorers filling in the last blanks on the map.

Gorge of the Ling Chu, near the confluence with the Salween


“Near the north-eastern corner of Burma the mountains seemed to be trying to strangle three great rivers, the Yangtze, the Mekong and the Salween. Beyond that the rivers spread out in a fan, with the Salween as left-hand or Western rib. Together they drained an enormous area. Up there, in eastern Tibet nearly everything was marked in dots, both roads and rivers. Several place-names had an interesting note of interrogation after them. Even the mountain ranges were drawn in tentatively, and heights were hardly shown at all. A few routes were definite, routes followed by European travellers. But there was a lot of blank space in between. And, except at two or three points where it had been crossed, the upper course of the Salween where it was called the Nak Chu (Black River), some hundreds of miles in length, was entirely conjectural.”

It is a colonial fallacy, of course. These regions weren’t entirely unknown. There were roads and towns as Hanbury-Tracy references, and before they set out they had to secure the necessary travel permits from the British-Indian and Tibetan Governments in order to allow them to enter the region and to make use of the local porterage system. In most parts they were following routes which had been trodden for centuries by traders, pilgrims, and soldiers travelling from settlement to settlement, valley to valley. And each region was clearly demarcated and already mapped out in the collective local mind. Indigenous administrative zones delineated economic and territorial distinctions which might not be readily apparent to incoming outsiders, but these boundaries represented a fixed reality which such European travellers often ran up against when local officials quibbled over the validity of their passports and as a consequence sometimes made them wait, wasting months in limbo on some occasions. 

A Chorten and Mani Stone pile, part way between Situkha and Wosithang


If permission to proceed was eventually granted sometimes the seasonal changes in weather conditions meant they were unable to continue hence they’d still have to turn back anyway. Whether or not this kind of delay was a deliberate ploy on the part of the local officials could be a moot point – there could be any number of reasons prompting such hold-ups. For instance, sometimes a regional governor might be worried that some parts of his territory were too dangerous (due to roaming 'brigands' perhaps), and so they were understandably reluctant to let foreigners proceed if they could not guarantee safe passage. Explanations, rather than revealing genuine reasons, could well be fudged in order to save face.

Watching the 'Devil Dance' at Nakchö Biru


Kaulback and Hanbury-Tracy experienced a delay of this kind, waiting over two months at Nakshö Biru for confirmation of their travel permits during which time they were treated very hospitably even though they effectively felt like prisoners there. The fact that Hanbury-Tracy had grown a magnificent beard during the course of the expedition, of which he was duly proud, didn’t help their situation – as they later came to the realisation that it had fuelled suspicions that he might be a Russian spy! … Ultimately when their papers were duly verified and they attempted to continue on towards their goal of reaching the source of the Salween a combination of adverse weather, due to the advanced season, and the unsafe conditions, due to fighting on the route ahead meant Kaulback and Hanbury-Tracy reluctantly decided to turn back. It was a sad defeat. A defeat due entirely to circumstances beyond their control, having been deeply frustrated by the long wait for confirmation of their credentials, something which they thought was wholly unnecessary in the first place.

Crossing the Salween-Brahmaputra watershed, ascending a mountain scree slope



Crossing a rope bridge attached to a bamboo slider over a fast flowing river




Crossing the Ata Kang La and heading down the glacier, trekking through snow



But the sense of adventure their journey evoked was certainly real enough. Some of the terrain Hanbury-Tracy and Kaulback travelled through could physically test them and their pack animals to the limit; crossing high mountain passes and precipitously steep scree slopes, as well as fording fast flowing rivers or dangling from precarious rope bridges, battling their way through ‘white-out’ snow blizzards or intense tropical heat, the chances of physical injury, illness, or worse were regular risks encountered on the road. Plus, in the lowland jungle regions there were leeches – lots of leeches – which got into their clothes and left their skin peppered with bleeding sores. They used to play a dark-humoured game, keeping competitive tallies as to who had accrued the most bloodsuckers each day! – But such journeys were entirely justified in their own eyes. They were made in the service of science. Hanbury-Tracy hints that the thrill of travel was in fact the real lure, but taking two years out was no jolly ‘gap year’ jaunt simply in and of itself.

“With the goddess of Science as a sure shield against a barrage of questions we pushed forward our little plans. But the goddess made her own demands. Entomologists wanted us to look out for a particular species of tipulida, and that I discovered meant a daddy-long-legs. Botanists asked us to collect every possible kind of leguminous plant, meaning, to a non-botanist, those that looked like sweet peas or vetch. While ornithologists wished to know how high above sea-level a certain type of diver, minutely described, built its nest. And Ron was to collect rare snakes, in a jar of “pickle.” Already there was a glimmer of respectability about our schemes.”



There is a great deal of humour in Kaulback and Hanbury-Tracy’s travel narratives which belies the serious science they pursued whilst on the road. Kaulback published his own account of the expedition, simply titled Salween (1938), later the same year as Hanbury-Tracy’s Black River was published. Reading their travelogues in tandem is a rich and rewarding experience. I felt like I got to know both of them intimately, and moreso that I might well have liked and got on well with both of them. There’s something about Hanbury-Tracy’s writing which puts me in mind of myself (though I only wish I could write half as deftly as he does!), and Kaulback rather reminds me of my grandfather, not least because my grandfather once got himself into a similar, perilous scrape on a cliffside in a disused quarry near his house (whilst out blackberrying, I think) as Kaulback recounts during his Tibetan travels with Kingdon Ward in 1933: "The next few minutes were an entire blank, until I found myself, still terrified out of my senses, sitting on a wide ledge, clasping a bush as if I loved it, and wondering why I had ever left England."



Kaulback had first met Kingdon Ward at the Royal Geographical Society whilst he was learning various techniques required for surveying in the field. When asked to provide a character reference Kaulback’s old tutor at Pembroke College, Cambridge, memorably wrote back saying: “I have known Kaulback well through three tumultuous years at this College, and can confidently recommend him to you as an explorer-companion, or as a buccaneer, or probably best of all as the president of a South American republic.” … Undeterred (or perhaps inspired) by this quixotic recommendation Kingdon Ward took him on. As Kingdon Ward later wrote in his introduction to Kaulback’s first book, Tibetan Trek (1934): “I was impressed by his sound common sense and his anxiety to take work off my shoulders. Nor did he shirk responsibility. For the first few days after we left civilization, I was worried about him. Had I made a mistake? But I need not have alarmed myself. From Rima onwards, when he had work of his own to do, he began to shape into the real thing. His work was astonishingly accurate and neat. Above all he was thorough. He took an interest in everything, and was an excellent companion. I never wish a better.” 



Frank Kingdon Ward

Although Kaulback was only twenty-four years old at the time he quickly won his explorer’s spurs on this expedition when he unexpectedly had to cut short his participation and lead the return party back to India without Kingdon Ward at an inclement time of year. As Kingdon Ward described it: “To return through the Mishimi Hills during the rainy season was probably impossible [this was the route by which they had already travelled]; there remained only the long and difficult route via Fort Hertz and Burma. Could Kaulback do it? I believed he could, although the crossing of the Diphuk La had only twice been performed by white men, on both occasions by experienced travellers.”

Kaulback's last sight of Kingdon Ward, 1933

 

One can see a real progression in Kaulback’s two books as he rapidly shapes up into a serious scientifically-minded explorer. He developed a keen interest in snakes and often discomforted his companions by keeping the live specimens he collected inside his shirt. On one occasion he was bitten by a very poisonous snake but managed to isolate and cut the poison out before it could take effect. Hanbury-Tracy went on to become an accomplished traveller, noted for his journeys in South America collecting plants for the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew. On their return from Tibet they presented the findings of their expedition to the Royal Geographical Society and were duly praised for their efforts mapping vast regions of the territory they covered (25,000 square miles) and collecting numerous specimens of flora and fauna which they sent back to the British Museum of Natural History, even though they were unable to reach the source of the Salween for reasons beyond their control. The two men may well have undertaken a return expedition had the Second World War not intervened. Instead they each found themselves dedicating the war years to fighting the Japanese in Burma, as part of Force 136 (the SOE, Special Operations Executive), which conducted highly dangerous reconnaissance missions and sabotage raids, often behind enemy lines. Kaulback was later awarded an OBE (Order of the British Empire) for his wartime service.



Kaulback and Hanbury-Tracy’s Tibetan travelogues represent a confluence of romanticism and rationality. The romance of venturing into the unknown, travelling “off the edge of the map” (a favourite phrase of Kingdon Ward) “leaving civilisation behind” (a favourite of Kaulback’s). And the rational minded pursuit of science – surveying, charting, collecting, classifying – making the unknown known. Plus, perhaps equally as important, a process of shaping the self through hardship and feats of endurance. In many ways, in contemporary parlance, this was the notional ‘white man’s burden’ made manifest. Knowing oneself and knowing the world were in essence intimately bound up in notions of ‘duty’ and the ‘noble pursuit’ of scientific exploration, particularly when reflected through the reasoning characteristic of a typical colonialist’s world-view. 

Or as Hanbury-Tracy philosophises it: At bottom of course nearly all exploration springs from a desire to wander, a desire which is as potent in human nature as love or hunger, but he who wanders without valid excuse is labelled Beachcomber. So public opinion has ever forced those smitten with the curse of Ishmael to present new excuses, excuses which, curiously enough, have been repeatedly responsible for new empires, new trade routes, additions to science, and fresh luxuries for the critics. And as for the sons of Ishmael, they have often found that the excuse has ceased to be an excuse at all and become a real purpose with attendant responsibilities.

 
 


Hence, taking such travelogues purely at face value, it is all too easy to overlook the fact that underlying these endeavours was an existing network of indigenous people; official government permission, the grace and favour of local governors, local systems of porterage, rules and regulations, all of which either facilitated or frustrated the efforts of these outsiders. In studying the travelogues of explorers such as Kaulback and Hanbury-Tracy, as well as Frank Kingdon Ward, George Forrest, Reginald Farrer, George Sherriff and Frank Ludlow, I find it interesting to see the same indigenous names recurring (flickering through different, idiosyncratic renderings into English spellings) – I often find myself wondering what these local ‘fixers’ would say if I were able to ask them directly what they had thought of this curious group of European adventurers, the intrepid (and sometimes eccentric) men who repeatedly engaged them as their employers year after year. For such local agents were often more than simply the fleet-footed facilitators of these expeditions. They often shared their keen-eyed knowledge of the plants, birds, animals, and insects they collected, as well as learning the careful techniques of collecting and preserving specimens which were essential to the success of such scientific endeavours. Such expeditions must have been characterised by a two-way flow of knowledge borne by a mutual respect and understanding, if not always an equal sense of appreciation or level of comprehension. These were, after all, the men whom Hanbury-Tracy subtly yet significantly says were “our servants and also our friends.”





Bibliography

Ronald Kaulback, Tibetan Trek (Hodder & Stoughton, 1934)

Ronald Kaulback, Salween (Hodder & Stoughton, 1938)

Ronald Kaulback, ‘The Assam Border of Tibet’, in The Geographical Journal, Vol. 83, No. 3 (March, 1934), pp. 177-189

Ronald Kaulback, ‘A Journey in the Salween and Tsangpo Basins, South-Eastern Tibet’, in The Geographical Journal, Vol. 91, No. 2 (February, 1938), pp. 97-121

John Hanbury-Tracy, Black River of Tibet (Frederick Muller, 1938)

John Hanbury-Tracy's Photographs of Tibet - Jacques Marchais Museum of Tibetan Art 


The Gya Lam, Great China Road






Crossing the Salween, via a magnificent log bridge in a sad state of disrepair



Pangar Gompa





19 June 2018

Time's River - Reflections on a Research Trip



 


πάντα χωρεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει" καὶ "δὶς ἐς τὸν αὐτὸν ποταμὸν οὐκ ἂν ἐμβαίης
-          Heraclitus (c.535 – c.475 BC), quoted in Plato’s, Κρατύλος

I caught a glimpse of Arthur’s Seat looming overhead as the train pulled slowly into Waverley Station. The thought then struck me – that it had been something like fifteen years since I’d last visited Edinburgh. That seemed hardly possible. It didn’t feel like it was that long ago. Edinburgh is one of my favourite cities, and my memories of previous visits there seemed so fresh and clear. I’d been there three times before, each time for work. Twice working at the National Museum, and once at the Museum of Modern Art. On my last day at the Museum of Modern Art I got the job finished nice and early and so had some time to kill before my flight home. It was a nice day, weather-wise. One of the staff there who I’d been working with suggested I walk back into town along the Water of Leith ... Sounded interesting. I had no idea what an enchanted suggestion this was until I found my way down to the little wooded track and began to wander downstream, beside the winding brook babbling its way over stones, under a leafy green bower of arching trees. It was a gorgeously sunny late spring / early summer’s day. A sun-gilded day that remains etched in my memory. The solace of a solitary walk. Breathing fresh air. The sound of water, and the dappled dance of sunlight green filtered through trees, filled with birdsong. I had no idea then that this was merely a taster of my next trip, nearly fifteen years on.

The Royal Botanic Gardens, Edinburgh


I’ve just spent a wonderful week immersed in the archives of the Royal Botanic Gardens in Edinburgh. Getting to know the great plant hunters of the Sino-Tibetan borderlands of the early twentieth century through their own words. Trying to work out what they thought of each other; hoping to map out their networks of rivalry and reciprocity. Seeing how they balanced their pursuit of pure science and commercial prospecting; pleasing syndicates of eminent professors, wealthy aristocrats, and the financially astute seed barons of the big nurseries (Veitch, Bees, Caerhays) who had sponsored their collecting trips; journeys in which they intrepidly “travelled off the edge of the map.” 

The Science Building at the RBGE


Meconopsis 'Slieve Donard'
The archives of the Botanics really are a treasure trove, and, like the best of all archives, one which provides the researcher with a quiet calm oasis in which to sift and ponder one’s subject in peace and comfort. No matter how much time you spend in places such as these, it’s never enough time. There’s always plenty more to read through than you can humanly manage. You’d need a lifetime to do it all real justice. So many tangents tantalisingly present themselves as you go, carefully sifting and gleaning your way through pages made brittle with the passing of time; like peering through a slit in the curtains of memory, offering a glimpse into an intimate world long gone and altogether removed from our own. 

One of George Forrest's campsites, near Lichiang (Lijiang), Yunnan, with stone weighted flower presses in the foreground (RBGE/RHS)


At first there’s a strange feeling as you begin to delve and sift. A strange frisson of excitement and fear. The sheer quantity of words, all written in unfamiliar scrawls, seems utterly overwhelming. How on earth are you ever going to process, absorb, and assimilate all of this primary source material in the time allotted to you? – But the only thing you can do is start at the beginning, and simply begin to read. Slowly your eyes adjust. Slowly, you get to know the distinctive handwriting of your subjects. Gradually, you get to know the people they are addressing. Soon enough, you start to perceive the nuances of character. Hierarchies of class, social standing, formalities, connections, intimacies, expectations, gratitude, grudges, jealousies, friendships – all these aspects begin to emerge, bit by bit. Layer upon layer, you begin to build your own thoughts and perceptions of these people. But you should never forget to check yourself. You should never assume too much. For example, in this instance people in these archives may begin as rivals but later on, years and years further down the line, they can end up as esteemed colleagues, friends even. And you must always be mindful to the fact that there might be something you’ve missed. Things are bound to slip through the mesh. You may not be able to examine all seven metres of shelving as forensically as you’d wish. Sometimes other researchers are poring over boxes you’d love to get your hands on. Inevitably there will be boxes you’ll have to pass over on this particular trip, hoping you’ll get a chance to come back again at some point further down the line, to check your sources and refine your first siftings – it can feel like you are panning for gold in a river where all of the sand equally glitters and sparkles.

The Himalayan Blue Poppy (Meconopsis 'Slieve Donard')



The Hankerchief Tree (Davidia involucrata)
I’m a museum person by trade, I suppose. And in many ways that makes me a terrible researcher. All museum people tend to be hoarders, and we all have an innate tendency to invest great and equal importance to all aspects of the past. To us the most mundane remnants of the past can assume as great a weight as the most momentous things. A plain and humble undecorated pot sherd can sometimes tell us far more than the dazzling golden and exquisitely inlaid turquoise trophy statuette of some long dead king, and so we obsess over the minutiae and get bedded down in the details when time should be of the essence. I’m a completist. I want to assimilate and absorb it all. 

I often think though how lucky (and in some ways how cursed) I am that I left it so late to start my PhD – because now we have all the advantages of the digital age, things that simply didn’t exist when I was an undergraduate; where we can search through library databases, collating lists of obscure journal articles which we might never have stumbled upon otherwise; and likewise, when in the archives, we can scan and photograph reams of material which we can take away and pore over at length afterwards, outside the archive. Accruing for ourselves an endlessness to our quest which can beguile and overwhelm us by turns all the more oppressively. I’m often left wondering: where and when will I know to draw the line? Where and when to say here and no further: This is as much as I can humanly do at this moment ... My subject will always be evolving. I may need to revisit and revise the things I think and the things I write now further down the line. But then is then, and now is now. You can only cross those bridges further down the stream when you eventually come to them. It’s impossible to look at everything, to read it all and to take it all in, and know it all completely. As Heraclitus observed, you can only step into the same stream once, because it is always changing, always flowing … πάντα ῥεῖ




Archives seem static, but really they too are rivers, rivers of memory. Everyone will take different things from dipping into those same waters. That’s why it is also fascinating to bump into other researchers in such places, people looking at the same material as you. Others obsessed with the same historical characters as you are. Chatting to them reveals nuances you might not have seen otherwise. (I was very lucky on this particular research trip. It was like my bibliography had come to life! – Magically enabling me to make some great new academic friends, quizzing them directly on things I’d read in their published works). Similarly, consulting the same archives other scholars have worked on and written about before you may well cause you to revise your own thoughts and the opinions you’d made from reading their works. The things which may have seemed definitive may well begin to crumble, or, seen in a new light, they begin to change their reflections as you read around the passages those other scholars who have gone before you have quoted from these same letters, reports, extended diary entries, and the like. We are lucky these places exist.

Rhododendron campylogynum (Forrest 27357)


Rhododendron forrestii (sadly not in flower)
I was doubly fortunate on this particular trip. Reading through the words of the plant hunters, George Forrest, Frank Kingdon Ward, Reginald Farrer, Joseph Rock, George Sherriff and Frank Ludlow. The men who had stepped “off the edge of the map” (Kingdon Ward’s phrase, yet often echoed by many of his fellow explorers, “the first white men” to wander up these valleys and mountain passes). Some of their papers still contained packets of seeds they’d sent back. Seeds which had been cultivated at the RBGE, successfully propagated, and then sold to the public by commercial nurseries such as Bees and Caerhays, introduced to everyday gardens across the country. My inadvertent luck was timing. For this was the time of year when many of those plants they’d first brought back to the UK were now in flower. Each day after the library closed there was still a couple of hours left where I could wander around the gardens of the Botanics (which, unlike Kew Gardens, is free to enter!), hunting down those same plants. The Himalayan Blue Poppy, Meconopsis Slieve Donard. Augustine Henry and Ernest Henry Wilson’s tree of "ghostly handkerchiefs", Davidia involucrata. George Forrest’s Rododendron forrestii, and Rhododendron campylogynum. Kingdon Ward’s Rhododendron pemakoense.

Rhododendron pemakoense (Kingdon-Ward 6301)


In many senses, it seemed a perfectly rounded research trip – studying these men who were themselves so fascinated by nature, hunting through their words as they’d hunted for plants in the foothills of India, Burma, Tibet, and China. Each day began and ended with a walk by the Water of Leith. Time in which to think through ideas inspired by the words I was reading in the archives, planning out what material I hoped to examine that day, and reflecting on the things I had found so far. All the while listening to that relaxing sound of water babbling over a tumble of stones. Catching glimpses of birds down by the water’s edge or up in the leafy boughs overhead. Dippers, Chaffinches, Dunnocks, Robins, Blackbirds, Mallards. Meeting dog-walkers and their dogs gleefully happy to be out on the same riverside walks as me, feeling just as gleeful and happy myself. It hardly seemed credible that I was in a major city, with all this abundance of nature, wildlife, flowers and fresh air. A serendipitous discovery after dinner one night was the fact that the restaurant I’d dined in was the birth place of the artist, David Roberts – another explorer of a different sort, who in the early nineteenth century painted so many magnificent views of the ancient ruins in Egypt – his house built in 1605.







The House where the Artist, David Roberts (1796-1864), was born in. Built 1605.



That first afternoon when I arrived in Edinburgh I began by strolling up the Mound, past the Castle and then down into Grassmarket, in search of a second-hand bookshop I remembered from my last visit to the city – but sadly it was gone. Evidently long gone. Now a trendy eatery. Like all the other trendy eateries along that road. But happily I did find another second-hand bookshop near the Botanics, and perusing its musty basement I found a gem of a souvenir to compliment my trip – and more importantly to compliment the reading material in which I had been engrossed for the week or so prior to my trip: George William Usill’s Practical Surveying – A Text-Book for Students Preparing for Examinations or for Survey Work in the Colonies (London: Crosby Lockwood and Son, 1900). The books of Frank Kingdon Ward’s protégé, Ronald Kaulback, and his friend and fellow explorer, John Hanbury-Tracy (the subject of next month’s post here on Waymarks) are filled with passing references to mapmaking in these regions. Hence I’d long been wanting to hunt out a contemporary book such as this one, which might lend some insight into the rudiments and the mechanics of the scientific instruments and the survey methods which these rum chaps (their books are particularly humorous too!) would have been using on their long and arduous treks through the borderlands of India, Burma, China, and Tibet.



Dalrymple-Hay's Curve-Ranger



Plane Table



Transit Theodolite (fitted with a supplementary level)



All in all it was a highly productive and useful trip. Unexpectedly relaxing and refreshing, it was exactly what I needed to reboot my flagging mind and faltering stamina. It’s flipping hard trying to write a PhD part-time! – Trying to sustain concentration, snatching an hour here, half an hour there, in my lunch hour, in the evenings, and at the weekends; whilst still having to contend with day-to-day chores and the demands of an often very demanding full-time job. I seem to be permanently tired all the time, and often find I can’t help falling asleep after eating. I’ve never worked so hard in all my life; but my PhD is a real labour of love, and that’s why every day I sorely wish I had the luxury of focussing on it full-time. 



As I found my seat on the train heading home late on the Friday evening at the end of my trip I realised that the carriage was full of teenagers, sixth formers in their final year, who’d all been visiting the University at Edinburgh – “checking it out” as one of their prospective choices after they complete their A-levels ... It startled me somewhat to do the arithmetic in my head and realise that many of these kids were born around the same time I made my last few trips to Auld Reekie! … For a moment I envied them starting out, studying full-time. But then it occurred to me that I was just as lucky as them, in that even though it’s taken me a long time to figure out what area of history I wanted to specialise in, I’m very fortunate that the system allows people like me to come back into the education game (thanks to Birkbeck!). The stresses and strains for me are no less than they are for these kids; of course, some are the same (time, money) and some are different (work, life). But it’s all part of the process. That river of time somehow speeds up in some ways as you get older, but in others it also slows down. Time waits for no one, even when it dawdles. The Water of Leith seemed no different last week to how I remembered it on that sunny summer’s day all those years before (… before those prospective students were even born!) – the same river, but also a completely different one – archived in my memory, yet still flowing from the past into the future. 

I’ll get there in the end, and there will come a day when I look back and wistfully say to myself – “When I was writing my PhD … blah, blah, blah.” – It will be the golden times such as these, my research trips to the libraries and archives at the Botanics, the Royal Horticultural Society, the National Archives at Kew, the Royal Geographical Society, the British Library, and a whole host of other magical places that I will remember most fondly. Because it’s in these places where we are able to wander “off the edge of the map” and really begin to explore. The last part of the challenge though, as for all explorers, is writing it all up, tying it all together and charting our route through, so that others might follow where we have been and see the things we’ve seen, reinterpreting them anew.





Special thanks to Leonie and Graham at the RBGE’s library for all their very kind help and interesting chats about the wonderful archives in their care, their deep knowledge of which is truly fantastic. The RGBE’s library is certainly one of the most welcoming and comfortable research libraries I’ve ever visited. 

If you happen to be in Edinburgh next month and you are interested in hearing more about the plant hunter, George Forrest, do go to hear Leonie Paterson’s talk at Lauriston Castle on July 19th, 2018. 




Also on ‘Waymarks’














to 2005 << << << Rewind